<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Specifying an op-amp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2006/02/specifying-an-op-amp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2006/02/specifying-an-op-amp/</link>
	<description>afowejfaiwuehfakjnfa</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ajk</title>
		<link>http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2006/02/specifying-an-op-amp/#comment-4488</link>
		<dc:creator>ajk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladyada.net/rant/?p=8#comment-4488</guid>
		<description>I would like to mention that the AD8655 actually has a thermal noise floor of 2.7nV/rtHz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to mention that the AD8655 actually has a thermal noise floor of 2.7nV/rtHz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tober</title>
		<link>http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2006/02/specifying-an-op-amp/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>tober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ladyada.net/rant/?p=8#comment-12</guid>
		<description>This is a nice example and I suspect you're aware of the following but I wanted to mention a couple things for the potential edification of other readers:

1.  &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521370957/sr=8-1/qid=1142960834/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-7432314-0749561?%5Fencoding=UTF8" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Art of Electronics&lt;/a&gt; also contains some good information on op-amp selection.
2.  In a somewhat demanding amplifier design such as the one in your example, it is sometimes also worth considering a two-stage design.  Sometimes two op-amps of somewhat lesser specs (purchased as a dual monolithic device) cascaded appropriately work as well as and cost less than a single fancier one.  You generally wouldn't be able to get out of whatever noise requirement you have (for the first stage anyways) but the requirement for gain-bandwidth product of each op-amp is reduced appreciably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nice example and I suspect you&#8217;re aware of the following but I wanted to mention a couple things for the potential edification of other readers:</p>
<p>1.  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0521370957/sr=8-1/qid=1142960834/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-7432314-0749561?%5Fencoding=UTF8" rel="nofollow">The Art of Electronics</a> also contains some good information on op-amp selection.<br />
2.  In a somewhat demanding amplifier design such as the one in your example, it is sometimes also worth considering a two-stage design.  Sometimes two op-amps of somewhat lesser specs (purchased as a dual monolithic device) cascaded appropriately work as well as and cost less than a single fancier one.  You generally wouldn&#8217;t be able to get out of whatever noise requirement you have (for the first stage anyways) but the requirement for gain-bandwidth product of each op-amp is reduced appreciably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
