Comments on: Digg Button Kit http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/ afowejfaiwuehfakjnfa Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:34:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: alex http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-4295 alex Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:06:58 +0000 http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-4295 wat exactly do u use it for? wat exactly do u use it for?

]]> By: Emperor Dane http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-2497 Emperor Dane Fri, 04 May 2007 01:20:52 +0000 http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-2497 Interface directly to digg? does this plan incorporate some strange serial connection to the digg API. holy crumb muffins that would be amazing. theres these cheap radtronix 2400 baud serial links on Mouser for it to be 'wireless'. that is for everyone who still has a serial port. awesome stuff -Dane Interface directly to digg?
does this plan incorporate some strange serial connection to the digg API. holy crumb muffins that would be amazing.
theres these cheap radtronix 2400 baud serial links on Mouser for it to be ‘wireless’. that is for everyone who still has a serial port.

awesome stuff
-Dane

]]> By: ladyada http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-2461 ladyada Tue, 01 May 2007 18:28:17 +0000 http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-2461 Basically because we couldnt find a 4-digit LED display that would keep the cost low enough to meet our desired kit price. We might upgrade it in the future to 4 digits, tho :) Basically because we couldnt find a 4-digit LED display that would keep the cost low enough to meet our desired kit price. We might upgrade it in the future to 4 digits, tho :)

]]> By: Johnny http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-2460 Johnny Tue, 01 May 2007 18:23:37 +0000 http://www.ladyada.net/rant/2007/05/digg-button-kit/#comment-2460 Was there a reason to only using 3 displays instead of 4? It would seem only natural to use 4 so you could display "dugg" instead of "dug" and allow up to 9999 instead of only 999. Was there a reason to only using 3 displays instead of 4?

It would seem only natural to use 4 so you could display “dugg” instead of “dug” and allow up to 9999 instead of only 999.

]]>